14 July 2008

Growing Biofuel in Saltwater: Making New Cropland

Carl Hodges is a 71 year old Atmospheric Physicist. He believes in solving problems, not whining about them. As shown in the photo above, Hodges is attempting to prove that Earth's humans can grow more biofuel than they had imagined--in saltwater! No need to use arable cropland, or for "stealing food out of hungry third world mouths" [according to some whiners].
Hodges' knack for making things grow in odd environments has been on display at the Land Pavilion in the Epcot theme park at Walt Disney World in Florida and the Biosphere 2 project in Arizona.

Here in the northern Mexican state of Sonora, he's thinking much bigger....He wants to channel the ocean into man-made "rivers" to nourish commercial aquaculture operations, mangrove forests and crops that produce food and fuel. This greening of desert coastlines, he said, could add millions of acres of productive farmland ....Hodges has already built such a farm in Africa. Political upheaval there shut much of it down in 2003. That's why he's determined to construct a showcase project in North America to demonstrate what's possible....That's where salicornia comes in.

A so-called halophyte, or salt-loving plant, the briny succulent thrives in hellish heat and pitiful soil on little more than a regular dousing of ocean water. Several countries are experimenting with salicornia and other saltwater-tolerant species as sources of food. Known in some restaurants as sea asparagus, salicornia can be eaten fresh or steamed, squeezed into cooking oil or ground into high-protein meal.

Hodges, who now heads the nonprofit Seawater Foundation, plugged salicornia for years as the plant to help end world hunger. Do-gooders applauded. The private sector yawned....Then oil prices exploded. Hodges saw his shot to lift his fleshy, leafless shrub from obscurity.

That's because salicornia has another nifty quality: It can be converted into biofuel. And, unlike grain-based ethanol, it doesn't need rain or prime farmland, and it doesn't distort global food markets. NASA has estimated that halophytes planted over an area the size of the Sahara Desert could supply more than 90% of the world's energy needs. __More at LAT_via_CarlBrannen_via_GrahamHancock
Although it is not likely that sea levels will actually rise significantly in the next hundred years or so, it is quite true that industry cannot run without fuel. Given the tendency of the current US Congress to promote political peak oil energy shortages, it is important to pursue any source of useful liquid fuel possible.

Seawater can grow abundant single cell algae, or multi-cell seaweed, for conversion to biofuels. But if entire seawater plantations of land plants can also be grown, that opens up the process not only to coastal areas but to seasteads. Remember: the genetic engineering of plants is creating varieties of crops and trees that thrive in briny or salty water and soil.

You have to admire folks who single-mindedly pursue solutions to important problems. Quite unlike the whiners who populate most university department faculties--especially the social sciences and liberal arts.

More on Salicornia:
Salicornia provides value-added products: its seeds yield edible oil that is low in cholesterol and contains antioxidants; its succulent tips are used widely in Europe and USA in green salad dressings; the plant itself can be excellent fodder.

Research has revealed the potential of its biomass, too. The green biomass can be used as fodder for cattle. This fodder has increased milk yield by 15 per cent in addition to making it protein rich. The dry biomass is used to prepare particleboard (for use in furniture).

Labels: , , ,

Bookmark and Share

15 Comments:

Blogger Barba Rija said...

yeah, cause we all know how the sahara desert is kinda small, don't we?

Ahahah!

great laugh, al.

thanks.

Monday, 14 July, 2008  
Blogger CarlBrannen said...

The big advantage of farming on land as opposed to the sea is control over weeds.

And the thing to note about the "Sahara Desert" quote is that it is for "90% of the world's energy needs" which is quite a bit bigger than just the world's oil requirements.

The comment implying this sort of thing is impossible (because it uses lots of land) is a little ignorant given the fact that the Sahara Desert (3.5 million square miles) is not that big when compared to the arable land on the planet (12 million square miles) or the total land area (57 million square miles). More particularly, if this technology takes off, it would be used in a lot more areas than just the Sahara desert. Imagine the big pumps, I'm getting goose bumps already.

Right now the political argument from the greenies is that the US shouldn't drill in XXX for oil because it's not enough to "make the US energy independent". The same logic applies more generally. Since no single region can make the US energy indpendent, there is no reason to have any oil wells at all, LOL. These comments are not logic, they are just green demagoguery and they work because the public is stupid.

By the way, you don't need to reference my giving you a link, but if you're going to do that, my original source for the story is Graham Hancock's excellent news site. His revolutionary book on underwater archeology of ice age man, "Underworld" is the best read I've had in years. It should be cheap on Amazon, or pick up a used copy at your local bookstore.

Monday, 14 July, 2008  
Blogger al fin said...

Yes, compared to the Earth, the Sahara Desert is rather small, actually, as you say.

Tropical coastlines of islands and continents are far more logical places to build the saltwater farms. They are experimenting with the concept in Gujarat.

The local and regional applications of biomass and biofuels make the most sense. Help villages and local regions become energy self sufficient while earning some cash.

The big mega-projects can come later. Of course, that's not the way things are usually done. The big investors drive technological progress, and they want return on investment quickly.

Monday, 14 July, 2008  
Blogger al fin said...

Carl, I always try to give a reference for links that I didn't find myself. Thanks for the original link. I'll add that to the chain of credit.

Monday, 14 July, 2008  
Blogger Snake Oil Baron said...

There are a number of large deserts on the planet. Instead of covering one massive one, put networks of strips and ponds in loop formations so that the water doesn't evaporate too much before getting back to the outlet pipes. Then do desert reclamation projects in between the gaps. Extra moisture in the air from the salt water will condense as due in the morning, advancing the reclamations.

With desalination technology becoming cheaper you could add solar powered desalination well inland for communities, irrigating new crop land, aiding in desert reclamation and providing ponds for migratory birds crossing the desert. You might want to waterproof the artificial rivers bottoms to keep salt from leaching into reservoirs but since deserts are having their fossil water exhausted anyway the gain would far out way the loss if leaching did occur.

And where are the large amounts of desert land? In western American states, just south of Europe, in the middle of Australia, inside China... pretty much where you want biofuel and where markets for the byproducts exist.

Monday, 14 July, 2008  
Blogger CarlBrannen said...

Part of the attraction of discussing doing this in large amounts is the thought that it could change the African monsoon enough to switch the Sahara back to grasslands. By the way, one issue is that a lot of the land is high enough that it would require quite a lot of energy to pump seawater that high.

The latest word is that humans had little effect on the Saharan desertification. The climate has been warming for 10 thousand years. I guess one would have to do some calculations to see just how much the evaporation from salt water farming would change the situation.

Monday, 14 July, 2008  
Blogger Barba Rija said...

Well you people are taking it seriously, okay. I'll just wait and see then.

Tuesday, 15 July, 2008  
Blogger IConrad said...

Well you people are taking it seriously, okay. I'll just wait and see then. Ironically, greening the Sahara would decrease the terrestrial libido of a tropical region significantly, which would have an observable warming effect on the planet.

Of course... it would also lift millions of the poorest of human beings out of poverty permanently and enable them to adapt to the changes radically better than otherwise... but, well... global warming is a villain; poverty is not.

Tuesday, 15 July, 2008  
Blogger Snake Oil Baron said...

Barba Rija, I can certainly understand your skepticism - there have been lots of similar ideas that never went anywhere. But then, there are a lot of other ideas that never went anywhere until something like carbon fiber or more efficient motors or computer control changed the cost equations.

IConrad, "terrestrial libido"?

I don't know what that is but I am in favor of it. >8-)

If the land level is high, thus requiring energy to pump it up, some of it might be reclaimed through micro-hydro projects along the way. It would not regain all the energy put in to raising the water but it might help distribute some of the energy inland to where the desalination, agriculture and other projects were taking place. Solar power installations in connection with the salt-tolerant farms might help offset the energy cost of raising the water.

Solar and wind equipment near these centers might also help contribute shade to assist the local micro climate manipulation. some wall barriers could be used to provide wind breaks, more shade, and hold in cool air created by those "atomizing" misters that might be run at certain times of the day.

Tuesday, 15 July, 2008  
Blogger al fin said...

I believe terrestrial libido is closely linked to albedo, and is used to describe soil fertility.

As far as pumping salt water to inland desert basins over tall mountain ranges, I'm not sure it would be worth the cost. Maybe someday we'll have super-powerful energy beams that can burn holes through the mountains for such pipelines, energy transmission lines, data lines, etc.

Tuesday, 15 July, 2008  
Blogger Snake Oil Baron said...

Aren't some of those desert regions accessible from other sides, without actually going over mountains? It is hard to get a sense of the elevation over a large scale but some of the North African nations look like they have some gaps in the mountains opening into large desert planes. Or is that just a trick of the satellite imagery?

Tuesday, 15 July, 2008  
Blogger neil craig said...

The Aquarius project is about building floating islands powered by ocean thermal generators that, as a by product, lift vast amounts of nutrient rich deep water to the surface that can be in square miles of floating ponds to grow alae for food. Algae for oil seems equally credible & since 3/4 of the world is ocean & it doesn't invilve pumping water over hills I think this would work better.

Thursday, 17 July, 2008  
Blogger al fin said...

Baron, the point Carl was making, I believe, is that many inland desert areas themselves are at high elevation, so the water would have to be pumped uphill at considerable expense, even if no mountains intervene.

Neil, Aquarius was a "seastead" proposed by Marshall Savage as an intermediate step to colonising the Galaxy. It was rich on imagery and short on technical details that would help people actually achieve the vision.

OTEC (ocean thermal energy conversion) has potential for generating energy, promoting aquaculture, providing freshwater for drinking and agriculture, and providing air conditioning without using coolants. It is potentially available to tropical areas close to the deep ocean, and for seasteads such as Aquarius that float above the deep ocean.

Another possible technology is to spray atomized seawater into the air offshore and upwind from dry arid coastal areas, to promote precipitation and greening of the coastal deserts.

All of these schemes take a lot of energy, or startup capital.

Thursday, 17 July, 2008  
Blogger al fin said...

BTW, I apologize to Conrad for taking advantage of his terrestrial "libido" Freudian slip. Most of us have made similar or worse verbal slips in the course of conversation.

Thursday, 17 July, 2008  
Blogger neil craig said...

I thought Aquarius was as technically detailed as one could expect in a book aimed at a non-engineer market. Marshall Savage did have a thing about making it self sufficient which means, for example, the building method he suggests (acretion of seament out of the water) is probably not the cheapest way to go. Because OTECs work best when very big the island project is the sort of thing that requires the investment of a spare & speculative $1 billion over several years. However if it could be shown to produce $200 million in oil annually that would go a significant way to making it a commercial investment.

http://a-place-to-stand.blogspot.com/2008/03/petrol-from-sea-water.html

I think a cheap lash up without the idyllic island, just the OTEC & the floating plant ponds would be much more commercial than pumping seawater uphill into the Sahara.

Thursday, 17 July, 2008  

Post a Comment

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts
``