23 May 2008

Another Look at Seasteading, Rich Man Style

Seasteading is a familiar topic here at Al Fin. Now there is a new player in the game, who is playing with high stakes--Peter Thiel.
With a $500,000 donation from PayPal founder Peter Thiel, a Google engineer and a former Sun Microsystems programmer have launched The Seasteading Institute, an organization dedicated to creating experimental ocean communities "with diverse social, political, and legal systems."

"Decades from now, those looking back at the start of the century will understand that Seasteading was an obvious step towards encouraging the development of more efficient, practical public-sector models around the world," Thiel said in a statement....The seasteaders want to build their first prototype for a few million dollars, by scaling down and modifying an existing off-shore oil rig design known as a "spar platform."

This schematic illustrates the ballasting system that Wayne Gramlich imagines would keep the seastead from tipping over. The amount of water in the ballasts could be raised or lowered to move the seastead up and down.
Holl Liou/Wired.com

In essence, the seastead would consist of a reinforced concrete tube with external ballasts at the bottom that could be filled with air or water to raise or lower the living platform on top.

The spar design helps offshore platforms better withstand the onslaught of powerful ocean waves by minimizing the amount of structure that is exposed to their energy. __Wired__via__NextEnergy
Seasteading is an expensive and dangerous game. Any serious attention given to creating intelligent and durable seastead architecture is welcome. The ocean is one of the most hazardous environments on Earth, aside from the polar regions and extreme mountain heights.

Previously, seasteading was in the hands of the savvy and hardy folks who wrote the Seastead Book, at Seastead.org. The book is a work in progress, and should see some new material later this summer. Anyone who wishes a good introduction to the topic should go there first.

But there is something that big money brings to a project that can not so easily be done on a shoestring. Expensive and hopefully competent sea architects. Expensive ship-building facilities and crew. The ability to build and launch impressive structures in a timely manner.

That is not to say that Thiel's approach will be the first or last seastead floating defiant against whatever the ocean may throw at it. Thiel is also invested in The Methuselah Foundation, which suggests that he has a healthy degree of caution when viewing the future. He may want his seastead over-engineered with redundant systems which will make it impossible for those of more modest means to replicate. Or it may turn out to be an expensive piece of junk that sinks like a stone.

The long term viability of ocean living will be determined by multiple approaches, just as in any biological or economic niche. The design shown above appears far too limiting. It is not modular or expandable. It looks more like a very expensive toy, than a genuine attempt at a sustainable mid-ocean human living environment. But wait and see.

Seasteading.org (as opposed to seastead.org) is not the first word on seasteads, and will not be the last.

Labels: , ,

Bookmark and Share

4 Comments:

Blogger DANIELBLOOM said...

http://pcillu101.blogspot.com

as mentioned in NEW YORK TIMES

see link above

can you blog about polar cities idea, pro or con, with image from website?

Saturday, 24 May, 2008  
Blogger al fin said...

I have blogged about the Colonize Antarctica website, and discussed your idea in comments previously.

I like the idea of extreme colonies, including polar colonies and undersea colonies (not to mention space colonies), but not for the reason of "global warming." I think catastrophic anthropogenic global warming (CAGW) is a fraud that has taken in a lot of credulous minds, pretending to be based on "science," when it is actually based on political arm twisting, dishonest grantsmanship, and media pseudo-crisis hijinks.

So keep posting--add to your repertoire. But start adding better rounded rationales to support the effort. CAGW will simply not do.

Saturday, 24 May, 2008  
Blogger DANIELBLOOM said...

Thanks, Al, for feedback. Where is your blog post on Polar Cities? I missed it. Just from an engineering POV, can you discuss such communitites, maybe for global warming, or cooling, or just for hotels and fun? Sex even!?

DANNY

see NEW YORK TIMES discussion here. Maybe that will inspire you to do a real blog post. SMILE

http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/03/30/polar-cities-a-haven-in-warming-world/

Sunday, 25 May, 2008  
Blogger al fin said...

Dan,

I like the graphics of the polar structures at the links above. It is hard to see very many modern narcissistic incompetents wanting to live in such a taxing environment, however. Having been dumbed down, psychologically neotenised, and academically lobotomised by government schools, indoctrinating academia, and pop culture, most of them haven't the foggiest concept of what competence means in the context of an unforgiving nature.

The justification given by so many for pursuing polar cities--CAGW--is bogus and weak. An article of faith in a situation where the strictest scientific and engineering scrutiny are called for instead.

Monday, 26 May, 2008  

Post a Comment

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts
``