20 July 2006

Delayed Maturation: The Neotenous Society III

The human life cycle has been divided into stages by many theorists, including Freud, Erikson, Horney, Piaget, Lidz, etc. It is expected that a child must successfully meet the challenges of one stage, before it is properly prepared to meet the next stage's challenges. In other words, a child must grow up successively, in stages, to become a mature adult. This suggests the presence of many "rites of passage", often subconscious to both child and observer, throughout the maturational process. If a child misses a successful transition at a certain stage,it will have problems characteristic of that deficit.

One of the most difficult transitions is during the period of adolescence. In some cultures, girls are often married by fourteen or fifteen years old to cousins or wealthy strangers, sometimes much earlier. In other cultures, girls may be sold to a brothel at age thirteen or fourteen, to help support the family. Boys may be expected to join a religious militia or terror organisation by that time, or have been expected to blow themselves up in an act of religious martyrdom/homicide.

All of those adolescence scenarios could be considered "rites of passage." For North American youth, such situations would be rare unless the families in question belonged to particular religious sects, or unassimilated subcultures, and the arrangements were hidden from the authorities.

The typical North American adolescence involves mandatory government school education, with the atypical social pressures of adolescence magnified a hundred fold by the confinement of several hours a day with hundreds or thousands of other barely-in-control transitioning adolescents. What can one learn from the socialisation process in such a school?

Most adolescents in North America have not developed any meaningful skills or talents to set them apart. A few will be athletic standouts, some will be musically gifted, some will be good at math or science, some will be remarkably attractive and have slightly advanced social skills. But most will be scrambling for an identity and looking for a subculture to melt into. Often the most inclusive subculture is the "slacker" subculture--the subculture whose members avoid work and responsibility, taking such avoidance to the level of an art form. Petty crimes and academic ethical violations are not uncommon.

Most government high schools do not teach useful skills. They generally portray themselves as preparation for higher education, even though most students fall into the combined categories of "did not graduate" or "did not continue education past high school." This drops the students into a "no man's land" of dubious employers, often competing with illegal aliens who actually do have useful skills, and a stronger work ethic.

For a large percentage of inner city african american , hispanic students, and other minorities, the subculture with the strongest appeal is the identity culture--multicultural separatism--which is encouraged by official curriculum of government schooling, and by many universities. Separate styes of talking, walking, dressing, separate music and entertainment--sometimes completely separate languages--it is easy to avoid the mainstream, and the cultural intelligence that many mainstream employers demand.

Many colleges and universities offer special orientation weeks or weekends for minority students, and other separate events--to emphasize separateness, and to encourage the preservation of the separation from mainstream culture. Further curriculum continues to emphasize separation into tribes and cultures, celebrating the differentness rather than the things that bind people together and allow cooperation.

When it encourages tribalism, the modern multicultural curriculum frequently works against the maturation of the individual, and toward a resentful sense of victimisation. Combining hundreds of thousands and millions of resentful individuals with a sense of victimisation, leads to a society with a tendency to disintegrate. Resentful students are less likely to find meaningful careers, and less likely to put all of their effort into work for employers who they distrust and dislike. If the person never grows beyond this school/society-instilled resentment, they will never mature or reach their potential.

This type of designed obsolescence--or designed failure of maturation--leads inevitably to increased social and economic stratification. Eventually, North American societies may approach the unhealthy stratification that is seen in most latin american and third world societies, if the current regime of "education" is allowed to continue very much longer.

Ben Franklin suggested that there may be long term difficulties in keeping a representative constitutional republic functioning. He, along with Jefferson and other founders of the radical US form of government, might be surprised to learn that the general structure of the revolutionary republic has been maintained for so long--with many of its features copied by successful countries as far away as Europe and Asia.

But none of the early americans or canadians were faced with the neotenous effects of prolonged mandatory, dysfunctional government education. It is unlikely that any form of government that requires its citizens to take responsibility for their own actions, can survive this type of neotenous social engineering for very long. Children are not responsible for their actions, and it is children--adult children--that are being unleashed upon society. Illegitimacy rates up to 70% illustrate plainly the neoteny of many graduates of subcultural educational designs.

Here is an interesting history of multicultural theory and practise, for the truly interested. Multiculturalist tribalism is only one of the many neotenous forces acting upon modern North American society. More will be addressed in time.

Addendum: Here is a commentary by my cousin Abu, on Fjordman's piece above.

Labels: , , , , ,

Bookmark and Share

4 Comments:

Blogger d c said...

Actually, I think multiculturalism could be a force for tremendous economic gain. We are a nation of 300 million in a world of 6 billion. As the rest of the world catches up with us economically, more and more of the technological and cultural innovations that drive the world forward are taking place outside our borders. A greater share of global economic output will be non-American. If we created a Manhattan Project of foreign language education, our children would not only be the leaders of America, they would become the business and cultural leaders of the world.

I'm surprised that you would characterize multiculturalism as neotenous. (Please forgive me if I misunderstood you in that regard). Done properly, multiculturalism should be cosmopolitan, not tribal. It shouldn't be me retreating to my own culture, it should be everyone embracing everyone's culture. To look at the world beyond yourself reflects both maturity and fiscal prudence.

Monday, 24 July, 2006  
Blogger al fin said...

Thanks for your comment. I understand exactly what you are saying and thinking, and I assure you that we are talking about two different things when we use the term "multiculturalism."

Multiculturalism as it is taught in educational curriculum has nothing to do with other cultures or languages--as they really are. It is a stylized "multiculturalism" used as a club to condemn western culture and western civilisation. In fact, the "multiculturalism" taught to hapless kids in school is a bloodless, fictitious, monocult--pathetic, really. The moronic curricula planners who put these materials together should get out more.

Real multiculturalism would have feminists and genuine leftists up in arms at the misogyny, genocide, racism, and brutality that is dominant in most cultures of the world. I would love it if they would teach other cultures as they actually exist. They cannot do this, as it would expose their hypocrisy in their antagonism to western culture.

It is all about grabbing power, not at all about portraying the real world.

But then, that is how I see "multiculturalist curricula."

Monday, 24 July, 2006  
Blogger d c said...

I see what you mean. But there's a value neutral alternative--we could just teach the languages of the other cultures, and let people discover on their own what other cultures are like. Not that teaching foreign languages is easy, but it wouldn't be the most expensive or radical reform one could make.

Wednesday, 26 July, 2006  
Blogger al fin said...

I certainly agree that teaching other languages--and encouraging travel to other countries--would be excellent tools for teaching the young about other cultures.

Wednesday, 26 July, 2006  

Post a Comment

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts
``