30 March 2009

Algae Biofuels for $0.20 a Gallon? Peak Oil

Image Source Brian Wang

Update: After re-reading the article at NewEnergyandFuel more carefully, and after reading the materials at the AlgaeVenture site, I need to clarify the nature of the breakthrough. The impressive improvement in processing efficiency achieved by AlgaeVenture Systems is in the intermediate step of "removing, harvesting, and dewatering." This breakthrough will indeed lead to cheaper algal biodiesel, although for production costs of $0.20 a gallon we will have to wait for similar breakthroughs in the steps of oil extraction and fuels processing / synthesis. This is still a big deal. But not quite the "magic bullet" I at first thought. The Al Fin article below is edited to reflect this more careful second reading.

Algae is a monster at growing rapidly and producing huge quantities of oil. But until now, it has cost between $10 and $20 a gallon to produce biodiesel from algae. Now a company in Ohio claims to have cut the price of processing algae for oil production by a factor of over 100! The technology involves a continuous process de-watering and dry flaking of the algae for oil removal. Brian Westenhaus gives more information:
Ross Youngs, CEO of Univenture, the parent corporation of AlgaeVenture Systems said, “For nearly 40 years, it has been widely accepted that if the cost of removing, harvesting and dewatering algae could be reduced to $50 a ton, algae could become a significant source of fuel. Today we have demonstrated a truly disruptive technology that reduces that cost by more than 99 percent – from $875 per ton to $1.92 per ton. We believe that this breakthrough moves algae back into the spotlight as an economically viable, plentiful source of fuel in the future.”

If this works, scales up and is low cost to buy and install, “disruptive” might be a vast understatement. As the following chart form AlgaeVentures shows, and its loaded to their favor but not by far, the cost to gather, separate out the water and dry down algae so the oil can be harvested is a huge capital and ongoing expense. _NewEnergyandFuel
Read the entire article above, which suggests the "algal pre-processing" price per gallon for algae fuels may drop below 5 cents a gallon! Very difficult to believe, certainly, but breakthroughs have a habit of occurring when least expected. [ The total cost of production for a gallon of biodiesel would also include the costs of cultivation, oil extraction, and fuel synthesis costs. Even so, this development puts algal biofuels on the fast track to being the biodiesel of choice.]

The disruptive part of the technology comes not only from cheap and abundant liquid fuel that is coming, but from the potential to engineer the algae to produce a wide range of chemicals and other products such as high protein animal feeds. Algae are becoming quite useful for water purification of both municipal wastewaters and agricultural runoff. And for the climate catastrophe crowd, algae can eat CO2 like every day is Thanksgiving. This is very big news, if it works.

Update: Brian Wang also covered this story a few days ago.

The longer I think about this partial breakthrough, the more important it seems to me. Algae comes in many species, capable of growing in a wide range of environments. Algal oil production might range from 1,000 gallons per acre to 100,000 gallons per acre -- depending upon the growth setting and the species of algae. Even at the lowest levels, algae can out-perform palm and jatropha -- the best oilseed crops. It has always been a matter of finding economical ways of processing the algae, extracting the oil, and creating the fuel from the oil.

It makes sense that the breakthroughs for each significant step in the overall process would take place separately, and be achieved by different groups. The important thing is that significant progress is being made on all fronts. The cost of producing algal biofuels is falling -- and if enough progress is made the price point at which algal fuels can be sold will cross the price point for petrol fuels somewhere under $5 a gallon within the next 5 to 10 years.

If we do run short of fuel, the problem is more likely to be Obamanomics and Obamapolitics rather than any failure of technology. Any jackass can invent a faux crises, claim it must be solved or it will destroy the planet, then institute policies that create even worse problems as side effects. [Of course, there are some things that could destroy the planet, but Obama is not concerned about those] In this case, the jackass is the Obama / Pelosi reich, promoting a "solution" for climate change. Such stupidity adds significant urgency to the need to develop a non-food crop fuels alternative such as algae -- which thrives on CO2, thrives on salt water and wastewater, thrives in the desert where no crops grow, and so on.

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share

8 Comments:

Blogger CarlBrannen said...

Since I'm in the biofuels industry, I suppose I should comment.

The problem with algae is in keeping the purity of the line. What's likely to happen is that you'll find that some other type of algae will grow faster than the oil algae and will crowd it out.

The long success of ethanol production by growth of yeast is due to the fact that ethanol is a poison to most microorganisms, so the yeast purifies its own environment. I think that algae needs to be genetically modified to do something similar. If it produced alcohol that might do the trick.

To turn the algae mass into biodiesel is very easy. The technology already exists for this. After getting the oil out in any of a number of ways, what's left is backyard level chemistry.

Most of us think that algae will eventually solve its problems and eventually will be a big producer.

The primary chemical used in the conversion of (bio) oil to biodiesel is alcohol, typically either methanol or ethanol. It takes about 10% by weight and you end up with 10% glycerol byproduct as well as the biodiesel.

So even if algae and diesels is the future, we still will have a use for the ethanol distilleries being built. They'll probably run on cellulosic rather than grain.

Cellulosic is gearing up as the cost of enzymes drops. The enzyme used for corn (starch) is amylase. Cellulose needs a more expensive enzyme but as production increases, it should drop in price.

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger al fin said...

Great comment! Thanks Carl.

Genetic programming of algae for biofuels makes a lot of sense, and I understand that several algae biofuels teams are working on either selective breeding or genengineering or both.

You're no doubt right about the cost of cellulase enzymes dropping as cellulosic ethanol production rises.

But don't you know that it doesn't matter how much progress is made on biofuels? According to our saviours, the radical environmentalists, the problem is humans and western civilisation. Their aim is to chop the human population down to under a hundred million or so. Anything that stands in their way is pure evil, naturally. ;-)

(count me in as pure evil)

AF

Monday, 30 March, 2009  
Blogger neil craig said...

Strikes me that if an algae could be engineered that could (A) give off oil & (B) survive in oil rich water better than other algae it would solve the problem Carl mentions & bring refining costs almost to zero.

Whether this venture is as good as advertised it is clear that at least one of the different approaches to bio-oil is going to work.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger al fin said...

Interesting idea, Neil. I agree that bio-oil has a big future, as both you and Carl assert.

It would be good if the microbe would excrete its oil into the growth medium where it could be easily separated for processing. As microbes age and lose productivity, an easy way of separating the aging hulks for processing into solids products (high protein feed for animals or fish etc) would help.

The idea is to move from expensive batch production to more economical continuous production.

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems to me that the most promising technology does not involve algae or enzyme separation of sugars in cellulose.

The most promising technologies produce ethanol from gasification. These process gasify biomass, coal or municiple garbage and produce CO and H2.

These gases are then converted to ethanol through either bacteria or chemical conversion.

Here is a company which does the former:

Link

Here is a company which does the latter:

Link

If either or both of these technologies commercialize, algae oil would have a long catchup. I guess they might run out of feed stock, in which case algae oil might be needed. Could you imagine a time when garbage is a scarce resource?

James

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger Loren said...

Wouldn't it be even easier to put the algae in a container with a triangular cross section, and siphon off the diesel as it floats to the top?

Tuesday, 31 March, 2009  
Blogger CarlBrannen said...

The reason ethanol does so well at poisoning other stuff during fermentation is because it dissolves in water. Oil doesn't.

Maybe algae could produce some other poison.

Wednesday, 01 April, 2009  
Blogger neil craig said...

Though oil & water do not mix surely if the algae is producing enough oil to make it possible to simply drain off the surface 1 cm there would be bound to a poisonous amount in ponds to about 1 m deep?

Wednesday, 01 April, 2009  

Post a Comment

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts
``