Just Win, Baby, Get It Done; Voter Fraud in America

In the latest US election, Obama received millions fewer votes than he did in 2008. But the numbers fell his way on election night -- even in a number of borderline states where polls showed a clear advantage for Romney.

More than 4 million people who voted for Barack Obama in 2008 did not vote this year. But by applying new voter science, Obama nudged enough replacements in key states — many who were rare or first-time voters — to give him his margin of victory (leveraged even larger by the Electoral College).

Years of stealthy multimillion-dollar efforts paid off forAmerica’s left in the 2008 and 2012 victories by President Barack Obama. Using new voter science to get rare and first-time voters to go to the polls, the races have changedAmerica’s electorate — those who make the country’s decisions by showing up and voting. _Source

"New voter science" appears to be a euphemism for stealth voter fraud, flying beneath the radar of the skankstream and any other organisations with a will to enforce the nominal rules of elections. More than one Obama election official was caught red-handed teaching voters to vote at multiple polling sites. The "get out the vote" effort was particularly brisk and active this year, with many normally quiet polling sites being deluged with "rare voters."

The most often noted difference between American elections among the visitors was that in most U.S. states, voters need no identification. Voters can also vote by mail, sometimes online, and there's often no way to know if one person has voted several times under different names, unlike in some Arab countries, where voters ink their fingers when casting their ballots.

The international visitors also noted that there's no police at U.S. polling stations. In foreign countries, police at polling places are viewed as signs of security; in the United States they are sometimes seen as intimidating. _Source

In most other countries, the possibility of voter fraud is openly acknowledged, and active steps are taken to prevent it. In the US, the very real probability of voter fraud in large city precincts is denied by the skankstream. And so it takes place in the dark, spreading the rot of corruption unseen and un-noted.

...how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states. According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio's Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio's 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.

The inflated numbers can't just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by. _Source

Similar clearly fraudulent numbers were seen in several big city districts, across battlefield states such as Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, etc. -- as well as within usual suspects such as Chicago.

From PushBackNow (11/18/12) [DNC Granted Permission to Cheat by RNC Begining 1982 « PBN ...], we get specifics from Chuck Norris on how to eliminate fraud from occurring again. It makes good points on eliminating voter fraud in future elections.

This agreement gives a carte blanche to the DNC to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America per the Consent Decree, with a substantial proportion of ‘racial or ethnic populations’. _Source

There were a number of documented donations to the Obama campaign by overseas contributors, anonymous contributors, and fictitious contributors. These contributions were channeled directly to frontline "get out the 'vote' " efforts, as if they were legitimate contributions.

Fraudulent campaign contributions violations of campaign law

The only way to achieve an honest election is to reform the voting process to prevent fraud. But to do that, the courts must cooperate. In the US, the courts have already largely gone over to the dark side -- and are now doing so at a rapidly accelerating rate.

We are likely to see renewed efforts across the US to reform the voting process to prevent the large scale fraud which "advanced election science" allows to occur. It will have some limited effect. But the machine -- the Outfit -- is now rolling forward in high gear, with massive momentum, toward future US elections. It is not likely that honest US voters are aware enough or concerned enough about the problem to turn the massive forces aside.

When you combine this avalanche of corruption with the tsunami of debt and demographic decline, you begin to see a hint of the problem.

Good people will try to fight against the regression of the US to the third world mean, in terms of governmental corruption and despotism. Perhaps they can slow it down.

In the meantime, there is the Dark Enlightenment, and the imperatives which such an awakening will introduce.

More:

Here is one man's estimate of how voter fraud could have tipped the 2012 US elections:

BarackOFraudo Fraud Map _ via _ BarackOFraudo.com

Putting a Republican in the White House Would Be Like Electing a Protestant Pope

Of course, it might be interesting to have a Protestant pope once in a while, just to shake things up.

Visualising US Democracy

...look on the bright side. Your poor guy didn't get elected. You would have felt like a big winner, but putting a Republican in the White House is like electing a Protestant pope. An even bigger joke. A joke of such stupendous magnitude that perhaps it's not even funny at all. _Unqualified Reservations

Look at the 3D US election map above, and imagine how easy it would be to game an election, if you controlled most of the big city voting precincts. For most honest, hard-working people, it is difficult to imagine the machinations which ambitious politicians and their followers will resort to, with $trillions of other people's money on the line.

Here is one poll observer's experience:

I arrived at the polling place at approximately 5:40 a.m. I went into the polling place and showed my credentials to the Chief who showed me where to sit behind the poll workers who would be checking voters in to receive a voting certificate. All of the poll workers were either African American or Hispanic, with the only Caucasians being the Project ORCA watchers. The voters waited in a long line that went outside the building at all times during the day. At one point, probably around 11:00 a.m., I noted that the line was about 300 people long. The line did not break at any time during the day, and there was no time to take a break during the entire day from 6:00 a.m. until the final person voted at close to 8:00 p.m.

Throughout the day, I took note of many irregularities besides the abnormally long lines. The poll workers who regularly work the elections said that they had never seen turnout like what was present. I believe the lead worker said about three times as many people as usual turned out that day to vote and that it is usually a quiet, slow precinct. There were three parts to the voting process. First the voter waited in line to get to the point where I was standing and watching, which was the voter check in, where ID was checked and verified and voting certificates were given out to qualified voters. After receiving a voting card, the voters then stood in line to cast their votes at one of five voting machines. After voting, the voters stood in line to turn in their voting card. Each phase of the line was long and the lines all snaked around at all times.

I was only able to observe the check in phase. As people approached the station of four poll workers who were checking voters in, the voters presented one of the required forms of ID to the poll worker. The poll worker then stated the voter’s name, found them on the database, and then asked for the voter to state his/her name and address. Many, many people were unable to state their names and addresses without assistance. Many, many people said the name was incorrect on their ID due to them getting married or divorced. Many, many people said that the address on their IDs were incorrect due to them having moved recently. Many could not state either the address on their ID or their current address. Many, many people could not speak English and could not follow the directions of “state your name and address.” On the app from which I was checking names, the voter’s name and age appeared. Many, many times, I did not believe that the voter was the age stated on the app. Many, many times, when I went to check off the voter as having voted, the voter was already checked off as having voted. Several times, I would swear that I saw the same person voting twice or heard the same name voting twice, when the app stated that only one voter in the precinct had the stated name. Many times I saw a person who looked Hispanic answer to a name that he or she could barely pronounce that was obviously representative of some other ethnicity, such as Asian or Middle Eastern.

About half of the time that a person had a name or address conflict, that person was sent to the chief to have his/her credentials validated. Each time, that person was allowed to vote, as I saw no provisional ballots recorded throughout the day. About half of the time the person was allowed to verbally correct his/her name or address and was sent to the next phase of the line without having to go to the chief to be approved. I believe a good 10 to 15% of those who voted had questionable ID and qualifications. At one point in the day, an announcement was made that a complaint had been called in to the Board of Elections that handicapped people were not being allowed into the building to vote. The chief made this announcement and stated that it was an untrue allegation. I did not see any handicapped people going through the voting line. [...]

I believe that most people do not have three hours to wait in line to vote, and it is strange that all of these people with fishy IDs had hours to stand in line and vote. I found numerous blue Democrat ticket sheets showing people how to vote strewn around the polling place. With the lines being long and me not being able to talk to voters as a poll watcher, I had no recourse to accuse suspicious individuals of not being who their ID said they were. I did call to the Romney headquarters and report my suspicions several times, but I do not know what they could have done about the situation, as I could not pull suspicious people out of line. _Mencius Moldbug

And no, Romney's people could have done absolutely nothing about the very likely high level, organised fraud taking place across the country in large city precincts, almost exclusively controlled by Democratic Party functionaries and associates.

All of which leads to a slowly dawning recognition in the minds of the un-connected outsider majority: We are not in Kansas anymore, Toto. We are in Chicago. And in Chicago, it is the Outfit that calls the shots, whatever it takes.

For outsiders -- for those unwilling to check their ability to reason independently at the door -- we are entering a new and somewhat dystopian age. Some are referring to it as "The Dark Enlightenment." This new form of enlightenment is in part a recognition that democracy is inevitably gamed by the smart players, who develop more and more effective ways to wrest power and control over assets and institutions from individuals and private interests.

The Dark Enlightenment involves an understanding that in a world where powerful groups rove in wolf packs, it is not safe to be a sheep grazing in an open pasture, without protection that you can count on. It involves an understanding of the broad and multi-facedted inequality of human individuals and breeding groups. It involves an instinctive mistrust of grand utopian ideals and movements.

More on the Dark Enlightenment from Dennis Mangan

One possible long range vector of the Dark Enlightenment

Full "Dark Enlightenment" series of essays by Nick Land

Another look at the Dark Enlightenment by Jim Donald

All 10 Nick Land Dark Enlightenment essays conveniently presented on one page for easy printout or download.

"The Death of White America?" That's Not Why Romney Lost

This article is adapted from an article published on abu al-fin


Probably the best piece so far on "The Death of White America" was published recently in the UK Daily Mail.

For Republicans struggling to understand their defeat at the polls, the most chilling statistic in this week’s presidential election was this: Mitt Romney won the biggest share of the white vote that any Republican White House contender ever has — and he still lost.

In an election battle that was defined as much as anything by race, Mitt Romney won the support of 59 per cent of whites, but just 27 per cent of Latinos, 26 per cent of Asian-Americans and 6 per cent of African-Americans.

Thirty years ago, being unpopular with ethnic minorities would hardly have stopped a white establishment candidate like Romney from trouncing Barack Obama. But back then, whites accounted for almost 90 per cent of voters. Now they make up just 72 per cent of the electorate, and that figure is shrinking by the year. _DailyMail

Much more at the link.

In the future -- if demographic trends continue -- it will be impossible for white candidates to win election in most areas of North America, without large numbers of votes from blacks, hispanics, and other ethnic "minorities." But in 2012, that is not necessarily the case. It may be a bit early in the demographic evolution of the US to proclaim "the death of white America."

Only about 54% of eligible voters actually voted. And of the white voters who did vote, almost 40% voted for Obama -- and against their own economic future. It is one thing to proclaim "the death of white America" when white voters voted in large numbers and for their own future benefit -- and still lost. But that was not the case in 2012, when large numbers of white voters did not vote, or even voted against the futures of themselves and their progeny.

We should also not overlook voter fraud, which played a very large part in the final vote tallies brought in by Democratic Party controlled precincts. If you look at large Democrat controlled cities such as Philadelphia, Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago, Miami, etc etc it is clear that more votes were tallied than were actually cast in a valid manner.

Obama lost the states with photo ID laws

Military absentee votes delivered too late to count: could have changed entire election results

More interesting (and imaginative) speculation here

A short list of election day shenanigans

Strong photo ID voting laws favoured by strong majority of Americans

There are many reasons that Obama will be able to continue his corrupt and destructive reign over the US government for another 4 years. But it would be best not to draw exaggerated or premature conclusions from the election results.

For the near future, a better use of the time of US conservatives, centrists, and libertarians, would be to toughen up election laws to prevent future election fraud as much as possible.

BTW, giving up too early is one of the signs of self-defeating behaviours. Rather than giving up and proclaiming "The Death of White America," wouldn't it be better to think about how you could use your brain to guarantee a better future for yourself and your loved ones -- at least a better future than the one that Obama and his cronies have planned for you?

Focus on what you can do.

Chicago Mobocracy Prevails: A Pyrrhic Victory for Blacks

No group has suffered as much under the Obama presidency as American blacks. And yet like faithful servants, they continue to toe the line for the big man in the white mansion. They do expect some payback, of course. According to the NAACP, 95% of American blacks think the US government should give them jobs. 95%! That is roughly the proportion of blacks who voted for Mr. Obama.  Fantasy Island was never so whimsical.

It was an election day of rampant fraud, bullying, intimidation, and outright illegality. But the mob got the job done, and the nouveau haute noblesse are safely ensconced in the big mansion for another four years. Four more years of lavish parties, extravagant vacations, and policies of perpetual ruin.

Mr. Obama now has the flexibility he needed for dealing with Vladimir Putin's Russia, and all other antagonistic governments and popular movements. The US economy can now look forward to heavy handed bureaucratic regulation not seen since the 1930s under Roosevelt.

US business never truly recovered from the burst housing bubble and hyper-leveraged financials. Unfortunately, Obama never cared for the private sector that much, so business persons should not expect things to get better.

John Galt has not commented on the election results, but is said to be holed up somewhere in the Rocky Mountain west, growing a movement of rugged individualists and dangerous children.  More on that later.

Obama's ACORN Brings Third World Voter Fraud to Make Sure of Victory In November

In a county in Indiana, the first 2100 out of 5000 registrations submitted, were fraudulent Every single one. Across the US, the Democratic Party/Obama - linked organisation called ACORN is under investigation for blatant vote fraud similar to what one might see in Zimbabwe or Belarus. Watch this CNN clip and notice the journalistic fraud of failure to mention the close links between ACORN and Obama/DP. ACORN has submitted roughly 1.3 million voter registrations nationwide. One ACORN center in California was found to be hiring persons convicted of identity theft.

Notice the weasel words from the ACORN attorney in the CNN clip. And how dissociated from reality the CNN anchors appear to be--as if they are talking about their niece's third birthday party with clowns and balloons. The future of the free world hanging on third world voter fraud. I wonder if it's gonna rain?

The links between ACORN and Obama go back over 10 years, back to Obama's community organising days. "You scratch my back, I scratch your back. It's poifect!"

More on Obama and ACORN Here and Here

Update: The Complete Guide to ACORN Voter Fraud

Over 30,000 Florida felons still illegally on voter rolls

ACORN voting drives coming under national scrutiny

Most populous Ohio county pressing for fraud investigation of ACORN

Obama may inspire even dead people to vote for him with a little help from ACORN's convicted felons, some of whom appear to have the ability to "see dead people," talk to them, and sign them up to vote.

Image Source

Update: The Community Reinvestment Act--the law that allowed ACORN to use its Democratic Congressional Allies to pervert Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the point of almost destroying the world credit market this month--IS STILL IN EFFECT!!! And Chris Dodd is pushing to divert billions of dollars from the bailout BACK TO ACORN!!!! And Barak Obama is right in the middle of all of it