Just Win, Baby, Get It Done; Voter Fraud in America

In the latest US election, Obama received millions fewer votes than he did in 2008. But the numbers fell his way on election night -- even in a number of borderline states where polls showed a clear advantage for Romney.

More than 4 million people who voted for Barack Obama in 2008 did not vote this year. But by applying new voter science, Obama nudged enough replacements in key states — many who were rare or first-time voters — to give him his margin of victory (leveraged even larger by the Electoral College).

Years of stealthy multimillion-dollar efforts paid off forAmerica’s left in the 2008 and 2012 victories by President Barack Obama. Using new voter science to get rare and first-time voters to go to the polls, the races have changedAmerica’s electorate — those who make the country’s decisions by showing up and voting. _Source

"New voter science" appears to be a euphemism for stealth voter fraud, flying beneath the radar of the skankstream and any other organisations with a will to enforce the nominal rules of elections. More than one Obama election official was caught red-handed teaching voters to vote at multiple polling sites. The "get out the vote" effort was particularly brisk and active this year, with many normally quiet polling sites being deluged with "rare voters."

The most often noted difference between American elections among the visitors was that in most U.S. states, voters need no identification. Voters can also vote by mail, sometimes online, and there's often no way to know if one person has voted several times under different names, unlike in some Arab countries, where voters ink their fingers when casting their ballots.

The international visitors also noted that there's no police at U.S. polling stations. In foreign countries, police at polling places are viewed as signs of security; in the United States they are sometimes seen as intimidating. _Source

In most other countries, the possibility of voter fraud is openly acknowledged, and active steps are taken to prevent it. In the US, the very real probability of voter fraud in large city precincts is denied by the skankstream. And so it takes place in the dark, spreading the rot of corruption unseen and un-noted.

...how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns? The most realistic explanation is voter fraud in a few swing states. According to the Columbus Dispatch, one out of every five registered voters in Ohio is ineligible to vote. In at least two counties in Ohio, the number of registered voters exceeded the number of eligible adults who are of voting age. In northwestern Ohio's Wood County, there are 109 registered voters for every 100 people eligible to vote. An additional 31 of Ohio's 88 counties have voter registration rates over 90%, which most voting experts regard as suspicious. Obama miraculously won 100% of the vote in 21 districts in Cleveland, and received over 99% of the vote where GOP inspectors were illegally removed.

The inflated numbers can't just reflect voters who have moved, because the average voting registration level nationwide is only 70%. The vast majority of voters over the 70% level are not voting because they want to, they are voting because someone is getting them to cast a vote, one way or another. Those 31 counties are most likely the largest counties in Ohio, representing a majority of Ohio voters. This means the number of votes cast above the 70% typical voter registration level easily tops 100,000, the margin Obama won Ohio by. _Source

Similar clearly fraudulent numbers were seen in several big city districts, across battlefield states such as Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, etc. -- as well as within usual suspects such as Chicago.

From PushBackNow (11/18/12) [DNC Granted Permission to Cheat by RNC Begining 1982 « PBN ...], we get specifics from Chuck Norris on how to eliminate fraud from occurring again. It makes good points on eliminating voter fraud in future elections.

This agreement gives a carte blanche to the DNC to commit vote fraud in every voting district across America per the Consent Decree, with a substantial proportion of ‘racial or ethnic populations’. _Source

There were a number of documented donations to the Obama campaign by overseas contributors, anonymous contributors, and fictitious contributors. These contributions were channeled directly to frontline "get out the 'vote' " efforts, as if they were legitimate contributions.

Fraudulent campaign contributions violations of campaign law

The only way to achieve an honest election is to reform the voting process to prevent fraud. But to do that, the courts must cooperate. In the US, the courts have already largely gone over to the dark side -- and are now doing so at a rapidly accelerating rate.

We are likely to see renewed efforts across the US to reform the voting process to prevent the large scale fraud which "advanced election science" allows to occur. It will have some limited effect. But the machine -- the Outfit -- is now rolling forward in high gear, with massive momentum, toward future US elections. It is not likely that honest US voters are aware enough or concerned enough about the problem to turn the massive forces aside.

When you combine this avalanche of corruption with the tsunami of debt and demographic decline, you begin to see a hint of the problem.

Good people will try to fight against the regression of the US to the third world mean, in terms of governmental corruption and despotism. Perhaps they can slow it down.

In the meantime, there is the Dark Enlightenment, and the imperatives which such an awakening will introduce.

More:

Here is one man's estimate of how voter fraud could have tipped the 2012 US elections:

BarackOFraudo Fraud Map _ via _ BarackOFraudo.com