Vaccine Hope: Antibodies Neutralise HIV's Prick
NEW YORK, NY, LA JOLLA and SAN FRANCISCO, CA, SEATTLE, WA, September 3, 2009—Researchers at and associated with the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), at The Scripps Research Institute, and at the biotechnology companies Theraclone Sciences and Monogram Biosciences have discovered two powerful new antibodies to HIV that reveal what may be an Achilles heel on the virus. They published their work in Science this week.The approach to an HIV vaccine is necessarily more difficult than for most other viruses. This is not only because HIV's viran envelope is highly variable, but also has to do with the way HIV attacks the immune system. Traditional approaches to activating the immune system can actually make the disease syndrome worse, leading to the infection of many more immune cells.
...The two new antibodies target a region of the viral spike used by HIV to infect cells. The viral spike glycoproteins, termed gp120 and gp41, are highly variable and have evolved to thwart immune attack. But biochemical studies suggest that PG9 and PG16 target regions of gp120 that do not change, which probably accounts for their breadth of neutralization. Now researchers at the IAVI-organized Neutralizing Antibody Consortium (NAC), a scientific network focused on designing vaccines capable of eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies, will turn their attention to studying the molecular structure of PG9 and PG16 and that of the region they target on the HIV spike. _IAVI_via_MachinesLikeUs
That is why scientists grasp at any conceivable approach that may either block or blunt the effect of HIV on the immune system. In this case, it looks as if an effective "blunting" maneuver may have been discovered.
Labels: HIV
4 Comments:
I think any step in the right direction is a good thing. If anything, it gives hope to those tht might have the virus that there is something working towards an answer, and for the health professionals that there is something that they can do to try and treat it.
Hopefully there is something about this target, despite being highly variable, that would prevent it from evolving out of range of this antibody. I understand that the virus has a wretchedly high mutation rate so if there is a work-around to be discovered it would find it. It really is a sinister little thing.
I have heard of an idea of designing drugs which actually lower the mutation rates of pathogens but that may have only been in regards to bacteria. If there was a means of tricking the HIV into replicating more accurately it would extend the length of time a given drug would be effective before the virus adapted to it.
Is it just me or is it really easy to avoid HIV infection?
For most people in most circumstances, SG, you are right.
If you are a health care worker or in EMS it only takes one little accidental exposure.
Or if instruments are not properly cleaned, a visit to the dentist, physician, or chiropractor may leave you with an unwanted hitchhiker.
Be sure not to get in a serious car accident. The chances for exposure throughout such an ordeal from asphalt to ER to OR to ICU to regular bed to rehab are small but existent, particularly with multiple invasive procedures, blood transfusions, etc.
Children born with HIV . . .
Most HIV infected put themselves in high risk categories, but some people are just in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Post a Comment
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell
<< Home