Mental Chronometry As Alternative to IQ Tests--New Book from Jensen
First developed in mid-1800, MC was subsequently eclipsed by more complex and practically useful types of psychometric tests stemming from Alfred Binet. This class of mental tests, however, has no true metric relating the test scores to any specific properties of the brain per se. The scores merely represent an ordinal scale, only ranking individuals according to their overall performance on a variety of complex mental tasks. The resulting scores represent no more than ranks rather than being a true metrical scale of any specific dimension of brain function. Such an ordinal scale, which merely ranks individuals in some defined population, possesses no true scale properties, possessing neither a true zero or equal intervals throughout the scale. This deficiency obstructs the development of a true natural science of mental ability. The present burgeoning interest in understanding individual differences in mental abilities in terms of the natural sciences, biology and the brain sciences in particular, demands direct measures that functionally link brain and behavior. One such natural ratio scale is time itself - the time it takes the brain to perform some elementary cognitive task, measured in milliseconds.
After more than 25 years researching MC, Jensen here presents results on an absolute scale showing times for intake of visual and auditory information, for accessing short-term and long-term memory, and other cognitive skills, as a function of age, at yearly intervals from 3 to 80 years. The possible uses of MC in neurological diagnosis and the monitoring of drug effects on cognition, the chronometric study of special time-sensitive talents such as musical performance, and presents a theory of general intelligence, or g, as a function of the rate of oscillation of neural action potentials as measured by chronometric methods. Finally, Jensen urges the world-wide standardization of chronometric methods as necessary for advancing MC as a crucial branch of biopsychological science.
Source, quoting from Amazon.com.
MC can be very useful as an adjunct to conventional IQ testing, in the effort to bypass cultural bias and other test-taking artifacts. Inside the PC University environment, measurement of aptitude is frowned upon--particularly when measuring between groups such as race and gender. In the real world, it is necessary to discard PC in order to discover important but inconvenient truths.
Hat tip to Chris at Develintel.
Labels: IQ, neuroscience
2 Comments:
PC universities excoriate the idea of IQ tests for the world at large, but utilize ACT/SAT scores, both of which are IQ proxies, to maintain an intelligent student population. Harvard is Harvard not because of some pedagogical secret weapon, but because it takes in students with ACT scores in the average range of 31-34 (IQ 130-140).
Jensen, a pioneer in psychometric testing, is providing still greater evidence against the idea of a blank slate.
The blank slate is such a patently ludicrous and invalid concept these days. How can any reasonably intelligent person cling to it so desperately as university administrations and faculty want to?
The problem as I see it is the lack of intellectual diversity on campus--particularly among faculty and administrators.
Students are going through rapid changes neurologically between the ages of 18 and 25, so what they really need is exposure to a lot of different--hopefully intelligent--ideas. As they develop the ability to weigh the "heft" of these ideas against each other, they can choose for themselves. Sadly, most faculty and administrators seem to want to bully the students into adopting their particular points of view, generally well to the left of reality.
Post a Comment
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell
<< Home