15 September 2010

Women More Easily Blinded by Science?

A study from Michigan State University's Sociology Department has found that women have been more easily conned into believing in "a scientific consensus for catastrophic anthropogenic global warming" and the impending climate death of the Earth, than have men. This, despite the fact that most top rank climate scientists are men, and presumably members of the oppressive patriarchy of old white males.

Once the ClimateGate emails became public knowledge (see here and here), it should have been obvious to most thinking persons that the methods being used by the controlling inner circle of IPCC affiliated climate science were not appropriate, nor were they in keeping with good scientific practises. The use of denial of access to data, pressuring scientific publications not to publish studies critical of the "consensus of the insiders", the denial of tenure to academics skeptical of the catastrophist viewpoint, the willingness to ignore scientific standards of information exchange -- even to the point of breaking national laws of freedom of information -- should have been enough to tip off any thoughtful individual. Clearly something stinks inside the sanctum sanctorum of mainstreamed catastrophist climate science.

Who is more likely to pick up on the huge contradictions inside the rapidly shredding catastrophist camp -- thinking men or thinking women? It is impossible to know without actually checking. Michigan State sociologists have checked, and found that women are not picking up on the discrepancies. Why not?

Why do such women put their trust in authority figures, even when these figures have proven themselves untrustworthy?

More on this topic later.

Bonus: 5 reasons why water vapour feedback may not be positive, [which would destroy virtually all modern climate models, if true.]

AND a PDF study looking at cloud feedback (PDF) [which also has the potential to obliterate the results of most climate models].

Labels: ,

Bookmark and Share


Blogger Robert said...

because women tend to be more caring (about the environment and everything) and and submit to authorities. Just consider the traditional view on women.

Well, i guess you allready figured... ;)

Wednesday, 15 September, 2010  
Blogger gtg723y said...

Women are not known for their abilities in mathematics and science. It should be said that women are more easily fooled by pseudo science, and as said by kulturabsolut women are very trusting of male authority figures (evil man hating dikes excluded). So when you couple our empathic tendencies with our lack of ability and trust in men in white lab coats you get the perfect pretty little eco-terrorist.

Wednesday, 15 September, 2010  
Blogger Unknown said...

Perhaps this is for the same reason that women are consistently shown in polls to be more religious than men. More likely to believe in a personal God, more likely to pray etc.,

Friday, 17 September, 2010  
Blogger Unknown said...

This may be related to studies consistently finding that men are less religious than women, that is, less likely to believe in a personal God, less likely to pray daily, etc.,

Friday, 17 September, 2010  
Blogger gtg723y said...

Tim: Interesting point. Perhaps that is why it is all the more important for Americans to get back to church, to fill the human need for a figure of authority. Not only to aid in the moral development of the nation as a set of individuals but to prevent a false God from filling the need. Global warming, money, communism....

Friday, 17 September, 2010  
Blogger Unknown said...

gtg723y: Yes, I think that many atheists have not escaped their need for a God, worship and a need to sacrifice as cleanly as they believe.

Monday, 27 September, 2010  

Post a Comment

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts