Coal to Liquids: Smart Coal
Coal can be converted to liquids profitably as long as the oil price remains over 80$ a barrel. Brian Westenhaus has an article today on coal-to-liquids (CTL) that looks at some of the details.
The developed world can solve its oil and gas problems with F-T. All the facts and sources are enough to make an oil exporter very nervous, indeed....The CO2 produced can be piped to an algae oil operation conveniently located next to the CTL plant. Biomass can be easily integrated into the gasification and F-T process as well, providing a multi-feedstock, multi-product operation.
...even today with oil coming back to near $100 a barrel the F-T processes can be highly competitive. It’s the carbon and hydrogen available in the feedstocks that make pricing work or not. Coal at $50 a ton, as shown by Sasol can yield 1.25 barrels of oil equivalent, can be worth twice the feedstock price. South Africa found that Sasol profits got so high that excess profit taxes were levied.
In the U.S. several companies have started coal to liquid process experiments that range from pilot plants to commercial installations. The big oil firms like Shell, Exxon and StatoilHydro are already running in South Africa, Malaysia and New Zealand closing in on 60,000 barrels a day of production.
The little guys like American Clean Coal Fuels who is developing a 30,000-barrel per day combined biomass and coal plant in Oakland Illinois uses carbon capture and sequestration to keep the unused CO2 from the atmosphere.
Baard Energy is building a 53,000-barrel per day combined biomass and coal plant in Wellsville Ohio with a market for the excess CO2 headed to oil field enhanced recovery. _NewEnergyandFuel
Labels: biomass, coal to liquids, Fischer Tropsch, gasification
1 Comments:
You know, after some rough calculations with some heavily disfavorable padding, I came up with the interesting number that with the use of switchgrass as a feedstock (via slow pyrolysis biochar manufacture), and electrolysis for hydrogen generation, it would be possible to produce oil via the fisher-tropsch process, at $40.00/barrel, and use about 1/3 of the marginal land within the US to produce sufficient quantities of "synthetic petroleum" to completely satisfy the total oil consumption of the US in 2004. I //believe// we've doubled in consumption since then, but even still -- that would be leaving the "bio oil" from slow pyrolysis out of the picture altogether. (I assume the excess oxygen and the syngas would be combined as reaction mass to make the process self-sustaining in terms of energy genesis.)
This would allow a markup of over 100% for refineries looking to compete with petro-oil at $80.00/barrel.
I do believe it's safe to say that we will never see $200.00/barrel oil.
Post a Comment
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell
<< Home