28 January 2011

The Nuclear Power Debate

A TED Talks debate between the grand old man of true environmentalism -- Stewart Brand -- and a young but ditzy-green Stanford professor -- Mark Jacobson. An interesting look at how a TED audience reacts to the basic ideas in the debate. Make up your own mind.

A comparison of two countries who took different paths toward the goal of cleaner energy. Remember: When you come to the fork in the road, take it.

Anyone who has read Ted Rockwell's PDF on nuclear energy, John Droz' Wind Energy Facts, and Without Hot Air by David MacKay, is ready to make the decision between the "feel-good" trendy renewables -- wind and solar -- and the no-nonsense, thousands of years sustainable at full capacity -- nuclear energy.

In my experience, Mark Jacobson -- although a professor at a prestigious US west-coast university and a prolific publisher of papers -- is not a trustworthy source on this topic. Time will reveal his hidden motives -- which may be nothing more than naive wishful thinking -- just as time will reveal the IPCC for its hidden motives of obfuscation.

Cross-posted at Al Fin Energy


Bookmark and Share


Blogger Sword S said...

matter can be indefinitely recycled and acquired, the true underlying value and true pillar of the economy is energy supply. The whole world is eroding via entropy, even life itself is constantly struggling.

All roads, including nuclear fission that can increase energy output, can and will increase a nation's true wealth. The more energy the more real wealth, dollars and stocks are only imaginary valuations, underneath it all lies energy it is the key to maintenance, progress and real growth.

Friday, 28 January, 2011  

Post a Comment

“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act” _George Orwell

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts